Newly revealed emails, wrongly hidden from public by OAG, further suggest origin of renewed “Attribution” push CLW readers are aware of the new, plaintiffs’ bar-driven push to claim an ability to attribute climate change — all the way down to responsibility for individual storms, weather apparently is climate when it’s the right kind of weather […]
CLW’s Timely “Attribution” Revelation, More En Route
Both from today: CLW understands the PR mavens have been working several news outlets overtime to get these stories, indispensable chairs in the symphony of climate alarm scheduled to bracket the upcoming, first #ExxonKnew trial. However, to the climate industry’s apparent despair, it won’t be much of a climate trial but instead has devolved into […]
Proper “Attribution”: New Climate Paper Made to Order for #ExxonKnew Litigation
Energy in Depth provides a useful update on the history of the “attribution” push by the climate litigation industry. The internally acknowledged weaknesses of these years of “attribution” claims are much greater than CLW readers presently know. We do now know the origin of the most recent claims, a paper that has predictably sent some […]