Government Accountability & Oversight
Following on CLW’s prior, quite revelatory discussions of the climate industry’s push to establish “attribution science” as a credible thing, we see this article walking through the theory’s intended use. Relevant thereto, CLW notes this memo that recently surfaced from a state attorney general’s office out West, written by a University of Michigan law professor whose focus includes, e.g., […]
CLW has recently posted two items including “unlisted” YouTube video seminars from the plaintiff-recruitment process, released in public information by ‘recruitee’ New Jersey municipalities. A next video sets forth how to advance the industry’s claims about “Attributing Climate Change Impacts to Fossil Fuel Companies”. CLW readers know the history of the plaintiffs’ emerging argument that […]
Newly revealed emails, wrongly hidden from public by OAG, further suggest origin of renewed “Attribution” push CLW readers are aware of the new, plaintiffs’ bar-driven push to claim an ability to attribute climate change — all the way down to responsibility for individual storms, weather apparently is climate when it’s the right kind of weather […]
Both from today: CLW understands the PR mavens have been working several news outlets overtime to get these stories, indispensable chairs in the symphony of climate alarm scheduled to bracket the upcoming, first #ExxonKnew trial. However, to the climate industry’s apparent despair, it won’t be much of a climate trial but instead has devolved into […]
Energy in Depth provides a useful update on the history of the “attribution” push by the climate litigation industry. The internally acknowledged weaknesses of these years of “attribution” claims are much greater than CLW readers presently know. We do now know the origin of the most recent claims, a paper that has predictably sent some […]
